|
ɰ ϴ ° Ǽ ϱ ξ ҾԿ ϰ å ǥϸ ױ ޱϴٴ ̴. ε ߵ 7 簡 7 Ǿ ־ Ž ̿ ѵ ´. ȣ ° ٲ Ϲ̳ ʴ ó η , å Ÿ ġ 10 ġϴ ̺å Ұϴ. 輺 ġ ä '̿밴 ' ' ' ó ݺϴ ̴.
å κ 溸ٴ Ǽ ڷ ϴ 'ܼӰ · ΰ' ġߵǾ ִٴ . ܼ Ư 뿪 6 ķ, , ݱ Ģ ·Ḧ ڴٰ ߴ. ȯ ġ , ̴ з Ǽ ķ ̳ չ ȮϷ ä ս Į ֵθ ̴. ָ Ͽ 忡 ϰڴٴ ȹ ֱ û ʷ ̴.
ᱹ ̹ ߰ å ˸̰ ̴. δ 'θ ȭ' â ȣ ġ , ֺ 潺 ̳ ġ ý ãƺ . ȭ · ź й ߴؾ Ѵ. ҹ漭 һ Ѿ ü踦 Ȯϰ, 縦 ϷϿ ٺ Ȯϴ ؾ ϴ.
[ -AIȰ]
Lee Tae-seon, head of the Garden Industry Division of Gyeonggi Province, emphasized, "Due to the flood damage last year, the valley terrain has changed, so there are many underwater risk factors. We hope you will actively participate in the control of safety personnel, and we will take strict measures against illegal cooking or car camping that damage the park environment and threaten safety." This is the province's stance on the so-called 'Summer Waterfront Accident Zero Special Measures' that Gyeonggi Province confidently declared to secure the safety of vacationers visiting Yongchu Valley in Yeoninsan Provincial Park in Gapyeong. However, the reality is that the entire park is a dangerous construction site because even the recovery from the flood damage suffered last year has not been completed, and criticism is intensifying that it is a typical 'showy administration' to prevent accidents with only a few fences and enforcement personnel without fundamental safety infrastructure improvement.
The most serious blind spot is that the safety condition of the provincial park area is too unstable to welcome vacationers, yet it is eager to build performance by unreasonably announcing measures. As the province itself admitted, the recovery work for the flood damage that occurred in July last year is scheduled until the end of July this year, so normal use of all trails is currently entirely restricted. Even though risk factors such as underwater rocks or rapid currents that are invisible to the naked eye are scattered everywhere because the valley terrain changed entirely due to torrential rains, the measures put forward by the province are merely temporary fixes, such as putting wooden fences in deep water and deploying 10 safety personnel. Repeating like a parrot only 'users' caution' and 'blocking entry' while neglecting the structural dangers of the site is the epitome of administrative convenience.
In addition, it is also problematic that a significant portion of the measures put forward by Gyeonggi Province focuses on 'crackdowns and fines' that treat vacationers as potential criminals rather than safety prevention. The province announced that it would hire six special enforcement contractors to fine illegal camping, car camping, and cooking in the valley, as well as parking violations, under a zero-tolerance principle. The pretext of maintaining a pleasant park environment is plausible, but this is like wielding only the easy blade of regulation while avoiding efforts to expand legal infrastructure such as regular camping areas or parking spaces that can handle the influx of vacationers. The plan to deploy all employees to the field on weekends and holidays is also a showy excessive administration that only causes a waste of administrative power of provincial public officials.
In the end, this safety measure for Yongchu Valley by Gyeonggi Province is the product of a hollow, performance-oriented exhibition administration. On the surface, it shouts a grandiose slogan of 'zero casualties,' but practical safety fence reinforcement around the recovery construction site or the introduction of a scientific disaster prevention system such as digital water depth gauges cannot be found. The province must immediately stop showy patrol reinforcement or pressure administration centered on fine bombs. Instead, it should establish a constant emergency rescue system that goes beyond formal CPR training with the Gapyeong Fire Station, and concentrate all budget and administrative power on ensuring the fundamental safety of the valley by completing the flood recovery work as soon as possible.
![]() |
ymjs790729@naver.com
Դϴ.
|
2026.06.02(ȭ) 01:21
Ÿ Ź
























