|
ñϰ ¤ 7 48 ȸ Ȯ ΰ, ð 'ڸ ü ϳ ϰ ؾ° Ǵ õƴ' ĩ ð ִٴ ̴. ⱸ ɻ ܽűڵ ҷ ̷ 긮 ϴ ´ ϴ ܱ , ǿ ü ̴. ϳ ɻ ̰ , ̹ ߴ ֹε ƿ ȴ.
ð 'ī '̳ 'Ĺ ź Ȯ ' ȭ , ᱹ ؾ° Ƴ Ÿ ױ Ұϴ. б ̳ , , Ȯ ް ε å̳ ȿ ؼ ü . ֹε η ' ü' Ƹ , ħؿ å ִ ̴.
ᱹ õ ̹ ܽ û ȫ ˸̰ ü ̴. ġ ̶ ü ܱ ü ġ ȫ Һϰ ִٴ ϱ ƴ. õô ܽ ü Ű ġ ߰, 7 ȸ ٸ ڸǿ ֹε ؾ Ѵ.
[ -AIȰ]
An official from Suncheon City stated, "Suncheon Bay is the field of urban policy where humans and nature coexist. We will expand the blue carbon research, ecological restoration, and biodiversity conservation policies of the Yeojaman Bay area so that Suncheon Bay, which the world has paid attention to, can become a future solution for all humanity in the era of climate crisis." This is a stance regarding Suncheon City's extensive promotion using past achievements such as reverse reclamation and utility pole removal, taking the opportunity of the foreign press tour group hosted by the National Heritage Administration visiting Suncheon Bay. However, harsh criticism is raised that this is a 'hasty performance administration' trying to hijack achievements by taking the expansion and listing of the World Heritage for granted, which has not even been finalized yet, and is a showy event centered on external outreach.
The most urgent blind spot to point out is that regarding the result of the expansion and listing of Goheung and Yeosu tidal flats to be decided at the 48th World Heritage Committee in July, the city is already celebrating prematurely, stating that 'the foundation for managing the entire Yeojaman Bay as a single complete marine ecosystem has been prepared.' The behavior of gathering foreign reporters and distributing briefings as if it were a fixed future before the final evaluation results of the international organization come out is a diplomatic discourtesy that ignores the authority of UNESCO and is the greed of a local government blinded by performance-oriented approach. If any disagreement occurs during the evaluation process, the resulting waste of administrative power and damage to the public image will be borne entirely by local residents.
In addition, the flashy rhetoric put forward by the city, such as 'creating a blue carbon ecological garden' or 'expanding carbon sink projects based on halophytes,' is nothing more than building justification for a typical budget procurement to win the designation of a national marine ecological park. Cooperation with Seoul National University's research team, corporations, and research institutions was declared, but there is no concrete mention of compensation measures or conflict adjustment plans for local fishermen who will be directly or indirectly regulated due to the tidal flat expansion. Mobilizing residents for reed management and the hooded crane hope agricultural complex was beautifully packaged as 'subjects of conservation,' but practical win-win measures for the infringement of fishing rights to be tied up by regulations are missing.
In the end, Suncheon City's current foreign press invitation promotion campaign is the product of a hollow, exhibitionary performance-oriented approach. It is difficult to avoid criticism that the ecological value of tidal flats and the national task of responding to the climate crisis are being consumed as a short-term urban growth strategy for the local government and a tool for promoting the achievements of the head of the local government. Suncheon City must stop the superficial administration that only cares about the eyes of foreign media, calmly await the results of the UNESCO Committee in July, and concentrate administrative power on guaranteeing the practical right to survival of residents in the Yeojaman Bay area and building sustainable fishing infrastructure.
![]() |
ϼ jyh7583@naver.com
ϼ Դϴ.
|
2026.05.30() 07:15
Ÿ Ź
























